By
J.I. House & D.O. Hall
Division of Life Sciences, King's College London

 

 

 

Table 5. Biophysical properties, fluxes and efficiencies

 

Site

Lamto, Ivory Coast

Venezuela

Venezuela

Brazil7

Niger8

Nylsvley9

UNEP sites10

Site 1

Site 26

Kenya

Mexico

Thailand

Amazon

Humid

Humid

Humid

Humid

Arid

Semi-arid

Arid

Arid

Humid

Wet

Vegetation

Open shrubby

Grasslands

Grasslands

Dense scrub

Regen. shrub

Mixed

Grassland

Grassland

Grassland

Grassland

Period/treatment

Start wet season1

Other2,3

Dry season4

Wet5

Wet season

Dry

Wet

Wet/dry

S. Africa

unburned

(floodplain)

Feb

Mar

Apr

burned

unburned

cultivated

natural

8 weeks

annual

All annual measurement

Rainfall (annual mm)

1210

1257

1050

1500

623

800

580

2000

2100

Total Production (g/m2/yr)

2700

951

1292

1803

2036

9930

Herbaceous biomass only (g/m2)

600-1000

675

433

474a

503a

LAI, site average

1.2

Herbaceous layer

0.8

1.5

1.9

4.0

0.08 - 0.68

4.4

1.7

0.3a

0.5a

1-1.25

0.6

0-3.1

0-1.7

0.7-2.0

2.3-4.75

Trees

0.4

1.0

2.25

Radiation Balance

Incoming solar radiation, (MJ/m2/y)

7316

7190

6741

4400

(MJ/m2/d)

20.6

20.6

15.8

15.7

15.7

20

19.7

18.5

9.9-20.6

12.0

max (W/m2)

720

720

762

700

950

Net radiation, daily (MJ/m2/d)

11.2

11.9

12.0

8.4

7.4

11.3

max (W/m2)

630

550

550

410

360

650

750

mean daytime albedo a

0.08 - 0.23, av. 0.19, burnt soil 0.073

0.08

0.12

0.3

0.3

0.2 (0.4 soil)

0.11-0.15, av. 0.12

Roughness and Conductance

Vegetation height (m)

shrubs 2 - 6, grass 1

grass max 1.8

0.6

1.2

trees 9

shrub 1-3

tree 6; gr. 0.75

Roughness length Z0 (m)

0.0013

0.039

1.2

0.07

Zero displacement d (m)

0.0070

0.196

6.3

0.38

Aerodynamic cond. (mol/m2/s) max

0.068b

1.8b

4.0b

3.2b

Canopy conductance (mol/m2/s) max

-

0.039b

Surface conductance (mol/m2/s) max

1.0b

0.6b

0.15

0.4

Coupling coefficient W

-

0.17

0.29

0.17

0.17

0.32

CO2 fluxes

Leaf assimilation (mmolCO2/m2/s)

19-33

25

27

23

31

Canopy assimilation Ac, (MJ/m2/day)

0.138

max (mmolCO2/m2/s)

19.0

23.3

24.7

Soil respiration, (MJ/m2/day)

-0.036

max (mmolCO2/m2/s)

-6.6

-8.9

-9.6

Net ecosystem flux F, (MJ/m2/day)

0.102

daytime peak (mmolCO2/m2/s)

19.0

23.3

24.7

4

15

15

nightime peak (mmolCO2/m2/s)

-2

-5

-5

Efficiencies (g/MJ)

early

mature

annual2

net prod(g)/incident rad (g/MJ)

1.58

1.06

0.85

0.99

0.13

0.18

0.27

0.66

2.30

net prod(J)/incident rad (%)

0.7

0.32

0.80

NPP/IPAR Total = RUE

3.38

2.28

1.82

2.21

0.29

0.40

0.60

1.47

5.11

NPP/APAR Total

3.84

2.56

2.04

 

Notes:
References: 1(Le Roux & Mordelet, 1995), 2 (Le Roux et.al., 1997), 3 (Le Roux et.al., 1994), 4(San Jose, 1992), 5(San Jose et.al., 1991), 6(San Jose et al, 1998), 7(Miranda et.al., 1997), 8(assorted papers in Goutorbe et.al., 1997; Hannan et.al., 1998), 9(Scholes & Wlaker, 1993), 10(chapters in Long et.al., 1992) Where possible original values have been converted to standard format/units.
a Values here for grass and dicotyledons
b Calculated from the original data as inverse of resistances in s/m: At sea level and 25oC, g mol/m2/s = 0.04 g mm/s (Jones, 1992)
CO2 flux notes: Venezuela values calculated from original table for 30th July
Efficiency notes: Lamto- original values converted AG biomass = BG biomass, and IPAR = 0.467 Rs from values in paper. For other sites used IPAR = 0.45 Rs. RUE = radiation use efficiency, IPAR and APAR = incident and absorbed hotosynthetically active radiation. Kenya & Mexico values recalculated from original data; Thailand and Amazon figures from graphs of cumulative NPP against cumulative Rs

  ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Many thanks to Bob Scholes (CSIR, South Africa), Xavier Le Roux (INRA, Clermont-Ferrand, France), Jonathan Scurlock (ORNL, USA) and Joe Scanlan (Department of Natural Resources, Queensland, Australia) for providing information and making corrections to the manuscript. Dale Kaiser & Sonja Jones (ORNL, USA) for calculating tropical % of the Olson et al (1983) "grasslands" category.

Sadly, David Hall passed away in August 1999 before this chapter was published. His knowledge and love of savannas was only surpassed by his eagerness to learn and teach.

 

REFERENCES
Table 1: Previous estimates of area, biomass and NPP of savannas and grasslands
Table 2: Broad plant functional types found in African savannas (from Scholes et.al., 1997)
Table 3: Biomass reported for tropical grasslands and savannas
Table 4: Primary production reported for tropical grasslands and savannas
Figure 2: The relationship between total NPP and aboveground NPP

To read the complete "Chapter" by J. I. House & D. O. Hall, click on "Previous" or "Next"



     If you have entered this site from UNEP.NET or SCOPE, then feel free to use the link below to view the full site.